Permit 16245 and permit identity
The trail begins with permit records and the repeated use of Permit 16245. The public issue is whether later records rely on a stable parcel/address/well identity.
This page is written in an attorney-style evidence sequence, but every assertion is framed as verified, reported, inference, or unknown. The reader is invited to follow the documents.
The trail begins with permit records and the repeated use of Permit 16245. The public issue is whether later records rely on a stable parcel/address/well identity.
Well records such as 16672 and WP0029371 references are used to understand what was drilled, reported, and later treated as part of the regulated record.
1992 records matter because they appear to document physical system development after the 1990 permit period.
The 2003 map is a key exhibit because it visually identifies W1, W2, W3 and mapped infrastructure rather than simply narrating a single system.
Later inspection records and correspondence describe the system condition, but the evidentiary task is to trace those descriptions backward to supporting authority.
The unresolved issue: what document, if any, authorized treatment of the facilities as a single regulated system?